Reported Decisions

Reported decisions are judicial decisions, or opinions, of court cases that have been published in legal research literature and archives. These decisions are now part of the body of personal injury case law. As such, reported decisions are viewed as “legal precedent” and become guidance for currently litigated matters and future cases dealing with similar facts and circumstances.

Below is a list of reported decision cases previously handled by the injury law firm Davis & Crump. Many of these decisions were important contributions to the law. These cases are a testament to our integrity, credibility, and determined commitment to our clients.

Mark Davis:

• In re Cook Med., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70386 (S.D.W. Va. 2015)
• In re C. R. Bard, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89147 (S.D. W. Va. 2014)
• Banks v. Sherwin-Williams Co., 134 So. 3d 706 (Miss. 2014)
• In re C. R. Bard, Inc., 948 F. Supp. 2d 589 (S.D. W. Va. 2013)
• In re C.R. Bard, Inc., 287 F.R.D. 377 (S.D. W. Va. 2012)
• In re Chantix (Varenicline) Prods. Liab. Litig., 889 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (N.D. Ala. 2012)
• In re Hydroxycut Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 810 F.Supp.2d 1100 (S.D. Cal. 2011)
• In re Hydroxycut Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 801 F.Supp.2d 993 (S.D. Cal. 2011)
• Hensley v. Astra Pharms., L.P. (In re Seroquel Prods. Liab. Litig.), 542 F. Supp. 2d 1366 (J.P.M.L. 2008)
• In re Benjamin Moore & Co., 318 F.3d 626 (5th Cir. 2002)
• In re Benjamin Moore & Co., 309 F.3d 296 (5th Cir. 2002)
• Johnson v. Glaxo Smith Kline, 214 F.R.D. 416 (S.D. Miss. 2002)
• Ainsworth v. Capform, Inc., 784 So. 2d 1008 (2001)
• In re: REZULIN Products Liability Litigation, 168 F.Supp.2d 136 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)
• Estate of Johnson v. Hemingway, 779 So.2d 164 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000)
• Overstreet v. George County School District, 741 So.2d 965 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999)
• Brown v. Hartford Ins. Co., 606 So.2d 122 (Miss.1992)
• Schultz v. Beasley, 465 So.2d 343 (Miss. 1985)

Martin Crump:

• In re Cook Med., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70386 (S.D.W. Va. 2015)
• In re C. R. Bard, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89147 (S.D. W. Va. 2014)
• Banks v. Sherwin-Williams Co., 134 So. 3d 706 (Miss. 2014)
• In re Ethicon, Inc. Pelvic Repair Sys. Prod. Liab. Litig., 299 F.R.D. 502 (S.D. W. Va. 2014)
• In re C. R. Bard, Inc., 948 F. Supp. 2d 589 (S.D. W. Va. 2013)
• In re C.R. Bard, Inc., 287 F.R.D. 377 (S.D. W. Va. 2012)
• In re Chantix (Varenicline) Prods. Liab. Litig., 889 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (N.D. Ala. 2012)
• In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Prods. Liab. Litig., 780 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (J.P.M.L 2011)
• In re Hydroxycut Marketing and Sales Practices, 810 F.Supp.2d 1100 (S.D. Cal. 2011)
• In re Hydroxycut Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 801 F.Supp.2d 993 (S.D. Cal. 2011)
• In re Trasylol Prods. Liab. Litig. – MDL- 1928, 754 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2010)
• Fleeger v. Wyeth, 771 N.W.2d 524 (Minn. 2009)
• In re Trasylol Prods. Liab. Litig., 545 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (J.P.M.L. 2008)
• Hancock v. Mid-American Ins. Services, Inc., 836 So.2d 762 (Miss. 2003)
• Bogan v. State, 811 So.2d 286 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001)
• Vadie v. Mississippi State University, 218 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 2000)
• Whitmire v. Victus Limited t/a Master Design Furniture, 212 F.3d 885 (5th Cir. 2000)
• McFadden v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 766 So.2d 20 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000)
• Vance v. Union Planters Corp., 209 F.3d 438 (5th Cir. 2000)
• Ballard v. State, 768 So.2d 924 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000)

Trevor Rockstad:

• In re Cook Med., Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70386 (S.D.W. Va. 2015)
• Huber v. Eubanks (In re Estate of Eubanks), 2015 Miss. LEXIS 83 (Miss. 2015)
• In re Estate of Eubanks, 2014 Miss. App. LEXIS 35 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)
• Strickland v. Integon Nat’l Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154672 (N.D. Miss. 2014)

• Posey v. McKesson Corp., 2013 WL 361168 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013) (slip copy)
• In re Hydroxycut Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 801 F.Supp.2d 993 (S.D. Cal. 2011)
• In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Prods. Liab. Litig., 780 F. Supp. 2d 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2011)
• In re Hydroxycut Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 810 F.Supp.2d 1100 (S.D. Cal. 2011)